Watching the living nightmare unfold Friday, we
couldn’t stop wondering why police were not going into the Bataclan club.
There were reports of a tweet from someone inside,
begging authorities to launch an assault because people in the club were being
slaughtered.
Still, police made no move to rescue the innocent,
unarmed people inside.
The killers simply fired into the people laying on
the floor, re-loaded and went on shooting.
Watching the coverage, we were upset and disgusted by the lack
of movement on the part of authorities. Has there been an explanation as to why
none of the well-armed officers standing outside bothered to try to rescue the
victims inside?
Don’t police feel some responsibility for the
terrible number of people killed so casually inside? Aren’t the families of the 90 victims demanding answers – why didn’t police attack sooner?
The armed terrorists pulled up in a black car
outside the club at 9:40PM Paris time and police only stormed the place at
12:20AM. How is that not criminal?
I’ve had arguments with police acquaintances
before, telling them they have a responsibility to protect the innocent and
unarmed in dire situations. I was told by one officer I know, his first responsibility
is self-preservation.
Were police too afraid to go in to rescue the
helpless Bataclan concert-goers?
Police have guns so they can protect people who do
not have guns from evil individuals using guns to kill.
Where were the cowboys and overzealous macho cops
as people were dying inside?
I want to believe police officers would assume the terrible risk in the name of the innocent and unarmed who are being targeted by
violence; I was under the impression that’s their job.
Montreal police officer Denis Cote made all the
difference back in September 2006 when he went into Dawson College and took
down a deranged shooter.
If police can’t do the job, then make it easier for
citizens to protect themselves and their fellow citizens.
Don’t just stand back and let innocent people die.
No comments:
Post a Comment