So, Cadillac
is offering what it calls the “world’s first true hands-free driving system for
the freeway”. It’s called Super Cruise and is offered on CT6 model vehicles. I saw the
commercial recently and, I must say, no friggin’ thank-you!
I seriously
do not like where this trend is going. Do you think that in their haste to be
the first automaker to offer self-driving technology, competing car companies
have accounted for all possible situational contingencies? There’s just no way!
Other drivers, other vehicles, mechanical issues, confounding weather, road
conditions, construction, not to mention variables I haven’t even thought of -
there are an infinite number of unsafe scenarios that can unfold on the road in
a matter of a millisecond.
Do ice and
snow interfere with sensors? Does intense cold affect computer circuitry? If
wind blows a lawn chair or air mattress across a highway, will a self-driving
car screech to a stop, causing other vehicles to pile up behind it? How does a
self-driving vehicle respond to a mammoth pothole? Would it plow through a
family of ducks crossing a highway? I’ve got a million questions!
If you don’t
want to drive, why in tarnation would you buy a car? Hire a chauffeur!
Automakers are spending millions of dollars to develop road vehicles we can
just sit in. Donate the money instead, to scientists working to find cures for
disease. There are already plenty of vehicles we can just sit in and they go by
any number of names, including “taxi”, “limo”, “bus”, “streetcar”, “rickshaw”
and many more.
Photo Courtesy Flickr |
Is buying a
self-driving vehicle about the misguided prestige of being the first to own a
new gadget? I have yet to meet a consumer who yearns for a self-driving
vehicle.
Hey stupid,
you’re drifting out of your lane! Hey stupid, I’ll parallel park for you! Hey
stupid, I’ll stop the car for you before you hit that cyclist! Hey stupid,
you’re about to back into a brick wall! Hey stupid, I’ll send an electric
current through your seat to get you to stop texting! Soon, the morons who are
driving on our roads with IC permits (see February 3, 2018 blog, "What's In Your Wallet") won’t even
be required to pass a driver’s license; they’ll only be required to have enough
money to buy a self-driving vehicle.
For impaired
drivers and people who can’t think and drive at the same time, this technology
is ideal, but if you can’t think and drive, or if you drive impaired, you
should not have a driver’s permit in the first place.
If this is
about making roads safer, enforce laws, toughen laws, or, better still, stop
letting stupid people drive; make driver’s tests more difficult in order to
weed out the morons. Not
everyone should be driving. Not everyone is suited to operating a motor
vehicle.
I don’t
dispute that recent advances have made cars safer. Seatbelts, anti-lock brakes,
airbags, rearview cameras; I like them and rely on them. Other technological
advances, I have not tried. My wife’s car has auto-park. She’s never used it and neither
have I; I can park, plus, I don’t trust it. What if it bangs into another
vehicle, or an obstacle? How do I explain that?
I imagine
some self-indulgent types will use their self-driving vehicles to send their
children to school, or their aging parents to medical appointments, in safety
and comfort.
I don’t want
to be driven by a machine – I wholeheartedly subscribe to the antiquated notion
that says - I drive the machine. I want to make the decisions that steer
and propel my car.
Former US
Highway Traffic Safety Administrator Dr. Mark Rosekind, speaking on BBC Radio,
warns there will inevitably be lives lost as driverless cars are introduced,
but he believes that, eventually, streets will be safer. Already,
safety groups are concerned that ads, press releases, and statements by Elon
Musk, mislead and deceive Tesla customers into believing the vehicle’s Autopilot
feature is safer and more capable than it really is.
If I pledge
to buy vehicles I can actually drive for as long as I can drive, will
automakers pledge to provide drivers who choose to drive with vehicles we can
actually drive?
Automakers,
please continue to provide drivers who choose to drive, with vehicles we can
drive. Mazda’s
slogan gives me hope for the future – “driving matters”.
When I can
no longer drive, I’ll mooch a ride with anyone who cares, or I’ll take the
damnable self-driving bus.
No comments:
Post a Comment